The government should reduce the amount of money spent on local environmental problems and instead increase funding into urgent and more threatening issues such as global warming. To what extent do you agree
In
this
day and age, contemporary attention has been placed on whether the government should cut down on funding for domestic environmental concerns and allocate more resources towards emergency and hazardous problems
like global warming or not. From my point of view, I firmly disagree for the following reasons.
Firstly
, national environmental problems
result in the most important ecology-related worldwide warming today. In fact, global warming has emerged as a result
of air pollution in densely populated cities worldwide, stemming from excessive emissions of greenhouse gases and vehicular and industrial fumes. As a result
, addressing national environmental challenges makes a vital contribution to reducing global environmental issues. For example
, deforestation has been identified as one of the key factors that contribute to the severe destruction of plants and animals’ habitats and lead to the extinction of some rare animals.
Secondly
, local environmental problems
directly affect human health, compared to global warming which can cause far – reaching
effects on our environment for a long time. Correct your spelling
far–reaching
This
is because an unhealthy environment may have immediate and critical detrimental consequences for human well-being. To be specific, individuals who have absorbed noxious fumes emitted by factories, industries, and air pollution may experience a range of dangerous and potentially fatal illnesses, including respiratory ailments, dizziness, lung cancer, nerve disorders, and other related conditions. Meanwhile, globalization is likely to make water
level meter higher Correct article usage
the water
at the end
of this
decade, which [cq][cr]does not create immediately adverse influences on humans.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that spending on both local environmental issues and more urgent and dangerous obstacles like global warming’s [cs][ct]attention should be paid by the governments. By doing so they can effectively tackle the interconnected nature of environmental problems
and safeguard the well-being of both present and future generations.Submitted by lekaity966 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task response
Improve the clarity and accuracy of your ideas to fully address the task question.
coherence
Work on providing a clearer and more consistent logical structure throughout the essay to enhance coherence and cohesion.
task response
Use more effective and varied examples to support your main points, ensuring they are relevant to the argument.
coherence
Develop a more comprehensive and cohesive introduction and conclusion to provide a clear framework for your essay.
Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
Linking words are very important in your essay.
To score effectively on your IELTS exam, you should make an effort to implement short concise sentences coupled with linking words.
Almost every sentence in your essay should have a linking word of some sort.
In fact, the only sentences that can omit linking words are your background sentence and thesis.
Linking word examples:
- firstly
- secondly
- thirdly
- in additional
- moreover
- also
- for example
- for instance
- therefore
- however
- although
- even though
- despite