As climate change and global warming are causing more natural hazards than ever, it is often argued that politicians should take on more responsibility than individuals to tackle the damages made by human beings. In the following essay, I will explain why I disagree with
this
viewpoint.
First of all, Linking Words
although
politicians play a leading role in acting on actions Linking Words
such
as passing bills to prevent deforestation or raising the public's low-carbon awareness, in making these practices effective, they still need appreciation and support from their people to achieve good results. Linking Words
For example
, if people stop using plastic bags, the companies that manufacture Linking Words
such
products will switch to eco-friendly substitutes to survive in the market. Linking Words
Therefore
, residents are essential to Linking Words
this
process.
Linking Words
Moreover
, numerous research has pointed out that human activities have direct negative impacts on the environment. Linking Words
For instance
, animal husbandry is one of the significant contributors to greenhouse gas, our desire for all sorts of products results in plastic pollution, and the excessive need for cash crops Linking Words
such
as coffee and soybeans has led to forest exploitation. It is evident that our greed and desire have caused a massive burden on planet Earth. Linking Words
Therefore
, whoever creates a problem should resolve it. Small actions Linking Words
such
as recycling more, buying more energy-efficient household items, and using renewable energies can make a huge difference in securing our environment.
In conclusion, given that we all live on the same planet, if anything disastrous should happen, no one is getting away with it. Linking Words
As a result
, everyone, Linking Words
along with
cooperations, governments and the international community, is obligated to protect the environment.Linking Words
hadahada770930