Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.
It is widely argued that governments must invest
money
in public facilities and services instead
of spending it on entertaining elements like the arts. Although
a significant number of individuals support the topic for their own reasons, others are opposing
On the one hand, some people are against this
subject for their own justifications and they consider that the arts have popularity in society. To begin
with, young people desire to show their interests and talents, but they do not have an adequate budget to buy what they want like musical instruments and to conduct a musical concert on a public stage, for
example
, so they need money
from big institutions to be an official sponsor and adopt them. The other reason
is that these entertaining issues create a variety of jobs, so, it is not a waste of money
. To explain, actors, singers and musicians earn a salary and if it has been ignored these careers, they will vanish. As a result
, unemployment will increase significantly.
On the other hand
, governmental organizations must concentrate on society development in various fields is essential. The most significant and clear reason
that supports my agreement is that they must take care of the health sector. For
example
, patients suffer from a lack of devices as well as
provide comfortable rooms. Purchasing advanced medical machines, especially, in public hospitals is more important than building theatres. Another major problem which needs to be addressed urgently is that sick people who have been sleeping in hospitals for a long time because of having serious diseases. They require a spacious room to feel good and healthy atmosphere. These issues related to healthcare must be taken seriously. The other key reason
that makes me agree with this
point is that remote regions have a shortage of necessary facilities like water supply and electricity, so, instead
of wasting money
on music for
example
which is not necessary, these poor districts require a supportive hand from government to provide the required services. Thus
, this
subject bears plenty of positive aspects that I fully support it. Finally
, a common reason
is the community’s claim to construct and repair infrastructure to avoid serious problems. For
example
, destructive natural phenomena damage streets and buildings and authorities have to be ready in any emergency because they are responsible to fix damaged streets and destroyed building to protect their citizens. In brief, measures should be implemented to reduce the negative side effects of neglecting important elements.
In conclusion, governments have more awareness of this
issue and they have a clear version to make their nation live healthily and safely, so ensuring primary issues come first such
as the health sector, the education sector and infrastructure. In addition
, the advantages of this
topic outweigh its disadvantages.Submitted by memamema292 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?