Some people think more public money should be spent on roads and motorways than on public transport systems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The allocation of public funds for infrastructure development is a subject of ongoing debate.
While
some advocate for greater investment in
road
infrastructure, I believe that prioritizing public
transport
systems
is a wiser use of public funds.
Firstly
,spending money on public
transport
systems
can effectively alleviate
traffic
congestion, a problem that plagues many cities. With the establishment of sufficient railway
systems
and well-developed public
road
transit, the general public would be more likely to choose public
transport
over driving private cars.
In contrast
, the expansion of roads and motorways may divert
traffic
, but the provision of additional
road
space could potentially encourage the use of private vehicles, causing even worse
traffic
jams in the long run.
Therefore
, investing in efficient public
transport
is a more effective approach to addressing
traffic
issues and promoting a smoother flow of
traffic
.
In addition
, giving priority to public
transport
systems
holds the potential to address environmental issues. Efficient and well-connected public
transport
networks can significantly reduce the number of private vehicles on the
road
. By decreasing the emission of pollutants from cars, public
transport
systems
can improve air quality in the city, and meanwhile contribute to the mitigation of climate change through the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. In comparison,
road
and motorway expansion often results in a surge in the number of vehicles, exacerbating air pollution and increasing carbon emissions.
To conclude
, I disagree with the notion that more public money should be spent on roads and motorways than on public
transport
systems
. The long-term benefits of reduced congestion and improved environment brought by public transit outweigh the short-term advantages of
road
expansion.
Submitted by 76805977 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Infrastructure
  • Transportation
  • Congestion
  • Economy
  • Carbon emissions
  • Pollution
  • Social inclusion
  • Urban development
  • Efficient
  • Investment
  • Reliance
  • Boosting
  • Affordable
  • Private vehicle users
  • Public transport system
What to do next:
Look at other essays: