Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extend do you agree or disagree ?

Higher

fuel

price

is believed to be the most effective way to encounter the mounting problems concerning traffic and contamination. I do not concur with

this

proposal

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

and am convinced that there are more constructive alternatives to

this

solution. In the short term, a rise in petrol

price

can bring some instantaneous benefits. As the cost of

fuel

becomes higher, consumers will have to curb the amount of gasoline that they utilize, resulting in a fall in private vehicle usage.

However

, in the long run,

this

policy could have a detrimental impact on the economy. Increasing the cost of

fuel

will lead to a rise in the

price

of transported commodities, which could trigger a significant decrease in consumer spending and a downturn in trade.

Moreover

, more devastating effects are likely to be observed in oil-importing countries since they rely mainly on

this

source to produce their goods. Taking all these reasons into account, there might be some other measures to tackle traffic and pollution issues.

Firstly

, many alternative energies can replace

fuel

, namely wind, solar, nuclear, and electricity.

For instance

, some auto producers

such

as Toyota or General Motors have decided to manufacture electric cars to minimize the amount of exhaust fumes released into the atmosphere.

Secondly

, governments should provide more funding for improving traffic systems and public transportation amenities (subway stations, bus stops). In conclusion, the increase in petrol

price

does not turn out to be a holistic approach to current situations.

Therefore

, it is more plausible to invest in other sources of energy

as well as

develop efficient public transport infrastructure.