The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives.to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

These days it seems that more
scientists
should focus on the subjects that save human life. Scientific developments are occurring at a great rate but some of them do not seem to be of help to humans. In fact, sometimes the innovation is regretted by those who invented it.
This
is why many argue that science ought to make life easier a healthier than it was and should never harm people. The reason for my position is as a fellow. First of all, there is a strong argument that public goods should be a great priority for
scientists
. They are the ones who have the potential and ability to invent and discover the materials that change the world.
For Instance
, electricity, modern medicines, telecommunication and the internet are just some of the scientific invitation things that changed the world’s life for the better.
In contrast
, sometimes
scientists
do research just in the hope of adding to their knowledge.
While
they should make absolutely sure that their experiments do not harm, they may not know until they have finished how their findings will be used and whether they will be used to improve people’s lives. The scientist Nobel invented dynamite to help with mining, not knowing that it would one day be a weapon, and the scientist who discovered the life-saving drug penicillin did so quite by chance.
Overall
, it seems that science should improve the lives of people and that should be one of its aims.
However
, knowledge and discovery are aimed at themselves and as important for
scientists
. Sometimes
scientists
do not know how their findings and breakthroughs will be used until their work is done.
Submitted by raziahassani2002 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • crucial role
  • enhancing
  • quality of human life
  • advancements
  • medicine
  • healthcare
  • scientific research
  • solving societal problems
  • improving living standards
  • global issues
  • climate change
  • food scarcity
  • technological advancements
  • limitations
  • negative consequences
  • ethical considerations
  • sustainability
  • environmental preservation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: