Some people believe that one of the best ways to solve environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Whilst some people consider that to solve environmental issues the price of fuel for all types of vehicles should be raised, I completely disagree with

this

statement for some

reasons

: the primary

reasons

for rejecting

this

view are that it gives rise to increased inflation, and

this

way seems like punishment rather than a solution.

To begin

with, fuel is used by not only ordinary people but

also

a considerable number of companies. The increased prices may incur some economic issues

such

that as the cost of products or shipping can increase, authorities have to take precautions like making a raise.

As a consequence

,

this

, with increasing overpricing propels society into a negative circumstance since the balance between products and their prices will be disrupted, and the majority of society may suffer from poverty.

That is

why, making a raise is not a solution.

On the other hand

, punishments in which prices are increased are not a suitable way to solve

this

problem because it stems from many different

reasons

such

as generating electricity and manufacturing processes

as well as

cosmetic industries. Unless these types of

reasons

are taken measured, everything done is to be wasted because the main reason for pollution can stay to be not interfered with.

Therefore

, overpricing is not the correct way to solve, and

also

it causes many different problems

such

as economic and wealth issues.

To conclude

, the aforementioned

reasons

play a crucial role in objecting to

this

view because

this

seems like the cure is worse than the disease.

Therefore

, authorities have to find another solution.