Due to
the increase in the requirement for natural resources Linking Words
such
as Linking Words
oil
and gas, new Use synonyms
places
should be researched. I strongly disagree with Use synonyms
this
statement because it would destroy the natural environment for animals and birds, and it would lead to more harmful Linking Words
gases
in those high-oxygen Use synonyms
areas
.
Natural habitats for birds and animals would be destroyed. Use synonyms
In other words
, if new Linking Words
places
were explored for natural resources, other creatures would lose their homes, and many of them may die. Use synonyms
For instance
, recent research done in the Amazon jungle for Linking Words
oil
had a catastrophic impact on trees, animals and birds. Use synonyms
Therefore
, in my opinion, new Linking Words
places
should not be explored in search of natural resources.
Use synonyms
Further
, if unexplored Linking Words
places
were researched, it might lead to more harmful Use synonyms
gases
in those oxygen-rich Use synonyms
places
. Use synonyms
This
is because tree-cutting would reduce the oxygen level in the atmosphere, and Linking Words
as a result
, there would be a significant rise in other harmful Linking Words
gases
. Use synonyms
For example
, in recent research, it has been found that coal, Linking Words
oil
and mines release many Use synonyms
gases
that can kill people living in those Use synonyms
areas
. Use synonyms
Hence
, I believe that the search for more Linking Words
oil
and other Use synonyms
gases
in undiscovered Use synonyms
areas
would result in the release of numerous harmful Use synonyms
gases
.
In conclusion, I strongly disagree with the statement that new Use synonyms
places
should be discovered to meet the demand for natural Use synonyms
gases
and Use synonyms
oil
because it would lead to destroying the natural habitat and more harmful Use synonyms
gases
would be released in those Use synonyms
areas
.Use synonyms
KaranAwal15