Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

In recent years, it is believed by some people that individuals with professional skills,

such

as doctors and engineers, should be required to

work

in the

country

where they were offered training, others disagree that they should be given the chance to choose a place to

work

if they wish. In

this

essay, both these views will be discussed, and I strongly believe these two views are equally valid. On the one hand, graduates should have a responsibility to

work

for the

country

that has provided them with training. To be more specific, working for the providing training

country

is considered a return to the benefits that

country

Correct article usage

the country

show examples

has given as they see the potential ability after training of a particular individual.

In contrast

, if not, it may cause a large amount of waste for the materials that have been provided.

On the other hand

, the ability to choose a workplace is

also

seen as a legal decision

according to

these days democratic

Fix the agreement mistake

societies

show examples

society

Fix the agreement mistake

societies

show examples

.

In particular

, in terms of working, salaries are regarded as one of the most significant elements in choosing a job, so having an opportunity to choose a place to

work

is justifiable, especially for those who have the duty to take care of family members.

For example

,

while

working as a doctor in Vietnam is known for its high salary, in comparison to other nearby countries,

such

as Singapore, the salary earned by Vietnamese doctors is considerably small. In conclusion, having the ability to choose a workplace is a need,

although

the responsibility to practice in a

country

that provides training is inevitable.