In many cities the use of video camera in publich places is being increased in order to reduce crime but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom, do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks.

Driven by implementations of high technologies worldwide, the installation of surveillance cameras has proliferated in many cities,
thus
triggering concerns about whether it would place restrictions on our freedoms. From my perspective, we are able to see more benefits than drawbacks from the trend, believing that the infringement of individual freedom can be addressed in a proper manner. There is no doubt that residents would feel uncomfortable when they pay a visit to a public place, because of knowing that they are surveilled over there. For one thing, the watchdogs are able to trace their whereabouts through CCTV cameras added in public places so many people are reluctant to show up over there in a bid to escape from the following and recording,
thus
curtailing individual freedoms. For another, many electronic devices instilled on streets are connected to the internet, which in turn may be threatened by the “backdoor” that hackers are able to access to servers so that innocent people are exposed to lawbreakers.
As a result
, people have to watch out to protect themselves from privacy exposure.
However
, the issues discussed above can be solved with proper measures.
To begin
with, personal privacy should be well-protected, meaning that watchdogs should not have the power to check out the data involved if they are not permitted by authorities.
Furthermore
, the government can update cyber security to isolate the data regarding privacies from leakage. More importantly, surveillance devices covered in public places cannot only reduce crimes there but
also
make residents feel more free. On the one hand, it can deter criminals from committing crimes since they know police officers are watching them.
On the other hand
, dwellers can pay a visit to any public place at any time because they are safe enough under the protection of the monitoring system
as a result
of enjoying more freedom individually. In conclusion,
while
it may place a limitation on individual freedom, surveillance cameras do more good than harm.
Submitted by 76805977 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: