Some people believe more action can be taken to prevent crime, while others think that little can be done. Discuss both sides and give you own opinion?

It is considered by some people that more activity can be allowed to stave off

crime

. Whilst others disagree and think that possible action can be very dainty.

This

writer’s opinion is the former idea is the best choice and the reasons why will be demonstrated in

this

essay. On the one hand,

although

laws and actions have been established very early, the

crime

rate is still extremely high, because the punishments may not be reasonable and not enough for the offender to repent.

For example

, in

Sweden

Add a comma

Sweden,

show examples

there has been a terrible shooting incident, but the offender when caught is

only

Rephrase

apply

show examples

sentenced to only thirty years in prison under Swedish law, especially The perpetrator does not feel guilty but is happy because he is not being punished for

death

. It can be seen that even though many legal actions have been taken,

crime

rates can still occur.

On the other hand

, many countries have many legal means to deal with crimes appropriately, including the

death

penalty

. The

death

penalty

is a good solution for serious offenders of serial killers. The enactment of the

death

penalty

will cause those who intend to commit crimes to rethink their actions.

For example

, in Kazakhstan, the

crime

rate is higher than in China because the Kazakhstan government bans

this

method of punishment

while

in China it is widely used.

This

shows that the

death

penalty

works and stops many murderers. In conclusion,

although

some people are obsessed and fearful of not taking enough action against

crime

, there is an opportunity to prevent it by the regular execution of the

death

penalty

.