The question of who is obligated to tackle the problem of over-packaging has sparked heated debate. Some think that the producers and retail shops should sell less packaged products,
while
others view that consumers have responsibility regarding their choices. In the essay, I will elucidate both standpoints in more detail and offer my personal opinions.
On one hand, manufacturers and sellers can actually mitigate the negative impacts that the phenomena bring to the environment, and Linking Words
further
enjoy lower costs and spending. And, there are many techniques that can be implemented. Linking Words
For example
, they can claim that their products are based on natural substances and craft an image of eco-friendly. Linking Words
Therefore
, in order to protect Mother Earth, the finished goods are intentionally designed and less packaged. In Linking Words
this
way, a company that uses the strategy can not only reduce waste but Linking Words
also
build a positive brand image.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, indeed, individuals are free to make any decision and are responsible for it. Linking Words
Furthermore
, most merchandise is introduced to the market mainly because there are citizens who adore them. Linking Words
For instance
, obviously, over-packaging products are favoured by some Linking Words
thus
they continue to exist. Linking Words
Moreover
, the market is generally driven by customer behaviour, if the public is well aware of what it means to buy an item that drains considerable natural resources, the populace may start to make some difference.
In conclusion, Linking Words
due to
the reasons listed above, I personally advocate that both parties are accountable for handling the topic. Generally speaking, it takes all humanity to work together to resolve Linking Words
such
a question addressed, Linking Words
otherwise
current situation will Linking Words
last
and gradually get worse.Linking Words
aaron.ten.tw