Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Some people suggest that the circumstances of a crime and the reason for committing it should be taken into consideration when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.

When it comes to punishing
crimes
, there's a debate about having set penalties for each type of crime or considering the circumstances and reasons behind the crime. Both sides have their good points. In the following essay, I will explain both sides and give my opinion. First of all,
people
who like fixed
punishments
say they bring consistency and clear rules to the legal arrangement. By giving specific sentences to specific
crimes
,
people
know the consequences in advance, which might stop
people
from committing
crimes
.
For instance
, it
also
makes it less likely that
people
will be treated unfairly.
Secondly
, others who like considering circumstances and motives argue for a fairer justice system. They say that not all
crimes
are the same, and the reasons behind each case can be very different.
For example
, stealing to survive is different from stealing just because you want something. By thinking about these
things
, the legal system can make sure that
punishments
are right for each crime. In conclusion, the debate between fixed
punishments
and thinking about circumstances and motives is not easy. By trying to do both
things
, we can have a justice system that doesn't just punish but
also
tries to be fair and help
people
change. In my opinion, sticking only to fixed
punishments
might make
things
too simple and not think about how
people
act. But it's important to have some rules to make sure
things
are fair. So, a middle-of-the-road approach that uses basic rules but can change them depending on the situation seems like the best choice.
This
way, we keep
things
fair and make sure that bad
crimes
get the right
punishments
.
Submitted by Andrea Barreto on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Task response is good, but try to provide more specific examples to support your points.
coherence cohesion
Coherence and cohesion are strong, with good use of linking words. However, consider structuring your essay with clearer topic sentences for each body paragraph.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: