Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The money spent by governments on roads would be better allocated to

railways

. I completely agree with

this

point of view because

railways

are more

environmentally-friendly

Correct your spelling

environmentally friendly

show examples

and

also

safer than roads.

To begin

with, the funds should be allocated to

railways

because it encourages green travel. Take subways

for example

, they have a larger capacity that can transport a magnitude number of

cargos

Fix the agreement mistake

cargo

show examples

and

people

at once, equivalent to many times greater than cars.

This

can contribute to reducing carbon footprint and

further

mitigate global warming. If governments allocate money to subways to help

people

get around

easier

Correct word choice

more easily

show examples

, they might choose to use them as their major means of

transportation

rather than cars.

Moreover

,

railways

help

people

to travel safer because means of

transportation

that run on

railways

are not affected by weather conditions. They are designed to run on tracks, which provides a stable surface for them to travel on, no matter the weather.

Thus

, they typically have little trouble through severe weather conditions like heavy rain, snow and strong winds

that

Correct pronoun usage

which

show examples

helps them be less prone to weather-related accidents.

For instance

, in 2012, more than 35,000

people

died as passengers in cars, 449 in mostly general-aviation aircraft and five as train passengers,

according to

the Bureau of

Transportation

Statistics. In conclusion, governments should allocate money to developing

railways

instead

of roads. I totally agree with

this

idea because

railways

are friendly to the environment and all means of

transportation

that run on

railways

are safer than others.