In the interest of road safety, cyclists should be required to pass a test before they are allowed on public roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is argued that

cyclists

should learn about

road

safety and go through the exam before they are permitted on public

roads

.

This

essay completely agrees with that statement because when bikers do not have knowledge about

rules

, it is a hazardous situation for their lives and they must understand the basic transit

rules

. Many people like riding a bike because it is beneficial for their physical health. When they do not have knowledge about

road

safety, there are high chance that someone can meet with an accident and interrupt other crawlers.

In other words

, bicyclists must learn about basic

rules

because It will lead to a decrease in many misfortunes on public

roads

.

For example

, many wheelers in Uzbekistan understand and know about

rules

on the

roads

and it reduces accidents on public

roads

. The government should take the exam before

cyclists

are allowed on public

roads

.

That is

to say, many

cyclists

feel they are essentially the same as cars and weave into

traffic

where cars and motorbikes travelling at faster speeds rightly belong. If there was better education and a law that required

cyclists

to learn unwritten

rules

of etiquette,

this

would greatly enhance

road

conditions for motorists and pedestrians.

For example

,

cyclists

in Kazakhstan must know basic

rules

,

such

as

traffic

lights, ride in designated areas and not interfere with public

traffic

or hospital vehicles. In conclusion, bikers should take a test and learn the main

rules

of safe

road

traffic

before riding a bike on public

roads

.

Therefore

, I believe that knowing the

rules

of the

road

can reduce the number of dangerous situations in the lives of many people.