n a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Transportation plays a key role in every nation. As

such

, it is not surprising that people have divergent opinions about whether to construct new high-speed

railways

or upgrade public transport

that is

being used now. From my perspective, I consider building new high-speed

railways

more important. Undeniably, the biggest merit of

railways

is time-efficient. Commuters travelling to and from work can sharply reduce the time, and tourists can

also

take advantage of its convenience. What’s more, trains have a high capacity and

thus

are able to contain many passengers once a ride. From that case, it is believed that trains emit less carbon emissions and are more environmentally friendly than driving your own cars or taking a flight. The

last

point is that

railways

have

lower

Add an article

a lower

show examples

risk of accidents since the tracks are separated.

On the other hand

, it is imperative to improve the quality of roads. Unlike

railways

, better roads are beneficial to those who prefer driving to taking public transportation as their daily commute.

Furthermore

, comprehensive networking of buses and overpasses can boost the national economy. A case in point is that agricultural products would be able to be transported to the market in a shorter period of time. In conclusion,

although

improving the existing roads is essential, high-speed

railways

can create other transportation systems and give the citizens an alternative option.

Not to mention

that we are all responsible for making the best endeavour to protect the environment.

As a result

, I am inclined to consider that the pros of constructing

railways

are larger.