Introduction
It is believed that ex-imprisoned individuals are the most appropriate those who talk to the young about the dangers of committing a crime. Personally, I strongly agree with the fact that they are. Because generally these are the only ones who truly livein acriminal situation , but they are
also
the only voice teenagers will hear.Linking Words
Body paragraph 1
To begin
, these people are those who lived through Linking Words
this
kind of situation , and now, they understand what they did wrong. Linking Words
In other words
, the time spent in the penitentiary made these people realise the errors they comitted and to some of them it made them want to apologise by becoming good citizens. Linking Words
For example
, imagine a criminal who spent ten years in jail and who is now a good citizen and wants to make amends. He will , of course, be more appropriate to talk with the younger generations than a psychologist who did not really live through Linking Words
this
type of situation.Linking Words
Body paragraph 2
To continue, these individuals are the best to talk about criminal life to younger generations because they are the only voices they will really respect and hear about. Because, normally, the teenagers, in an act of rebellion, do not respect authority.
However
, when , Linking Words
for instance
, a group of ex-criminals come to talk to them about their experience, they will respect them because Linking Words
firstly
they are impressed knowing the grown-up in front of them has once been a criminal. But Linking Words
secondly
, they will hear the speech with attention because some of them will see him represented in one of the speechwriters.Linking Words
Conclusion
To conclude
, I personally think that the people who have been in prison are the most appropriate to talk about criminal life to younger generations. Because they really know these kinds of situations , and because they are truly who are respected by the adolescents.Linking Words