The government should make laws about people's nutrition and food choice. Others argue that would be their choice. Discuss both views and give your opinion

Some contend that there should be laws to regulate people's nutrition and
food
choices,
whereas
others reckon that people should be able to eat what they want. In
this
essay, both sides will be explored, followed by my opinion. On one hand, proponents of government intervention in nutrition highlight the importance of public health and the
overall
well-being of the population. They argue that unhealthy dietary habits,
such
as the excessive consumption of sugary beverages, fast
food
, and processed foods, have contributed to a global rise in obesity, diabetes, and other diet-related health issues. To address
this
, the government should implement laws and regulations aimed at curbing the consumption of unhealthy foods.
Such
measures may include imposing taxes on sugary drinks, restricting the marketing of unhealthy foods to children, and requiring clear labelling of nutritional information on
food
products. It is believed that these actions can help reduce the prevalence of diet-related diseases, alleviate the burden on healthcare systems, and promote a healthier society as a whole.
On the other hand
, opponents argue that individuals should have the autonomy to make their own choices about what they eat.
Firstly
, different
food
has a positive or negative impact on customers’ well-being, but it does not mean that the government can use its authority to interfere with people’s decision-making, for fear that they make a wrong choice. Educating citizens about healthier eating habits could be a better alternative.
Secondly
, unhealthy
food
or not can be seen differently since people have various eating preferences and financial situations.
In other words
, it depends on one’s lifestyle and personal level of happiness. Rigorous laws banning all types of unhealthy
food
can negatively affect human beings as they ought to adjust their eating habits which is undesirable sometimes. In conclusion, I firmly believe that it is unreasonable to suggest that governments should control people’s diets.
Instead
, governments should focus their efforts on restricting advertisements and promotion of unhealthy
food
and educating their citizens about the adverse effects of
this
type of product on their health.
Submitted by nguyenlyacbd on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Provide more specific examples to support your points.
lexical resource
Use a wider range of vocabulary.
lexical resource
Ensure accurate and appropriate word choice.
lexical resource
Use more appropriate collocations.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: