The large number of private cars on the roads in many parts of the world has led to serious problems of pollution and may contribute to global warming. Some people think that governments should spend money for the development of public transportation systems in order to help solve this problem. Others think it is better to spend money for the development of electric and other types of cars that may cause less pollution. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Global warming has become one of the major concerns in the present. With an increase in personal vehicles
such
as
cars
not only deteriorates the environment but is
also
a potential threat which might fuel up global warming. Many people believe that public transportation and electric
cars
can be the alternatives to solve
this
problem
. The number of vehicles on the roads is directly proportional to
pollution
leading towards the presence of fresh air in the atmosphere. The concerned authorities investing towards the growth of public transportation can be the best possible way to deal with the current
problem
. To illustrate, on a certain lane of the road there are 24
cars
carrying only 30 people
as well as
one public vehicle carrying more than 50 individuals. Each car and the public vehicle pollute the environment at the same rate
hence
, the
pollution
by 24
cars
to the public vehicle is given by the ratio 24:1.
Therefore
, in my
opion
Correct your spelling
opinion
, encouraging the use and advancement of public transportation can be extremely helpful. The world is rapidly progressing in the era of advanced technology. In
such
scenario
Correct article usage
a scenario
show examples
, the investment in the research of a new variety of
cars
that work on different sources of energy can be the smart call. The recent boom of electric
cars
in many parts of the world has made a positive impact in many aspects , particularly in the conservation of fossil fuels,
reduce
Wrong verb form
reducing
show examples
pollution
and so on. The development of solar
cars
is a topic of concern that can result in the ultimate solution to
this
problem
as it uses
the
Correct article usage
a
show examples
perpetual source of energy. In my view,
this
approach can be the best of all the solutions available at the moment. In conclusion, both the development of public vehicles and electric
cars
can contribute to solving the
problem
of
pollution
and global warming.
However
, the advancement of electric and other types of
cars
holds the upper position with
overall
advantages.
Submitted by swikritishrestha90 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • congestion
  • emissions
  • pollutants
  • sustainable
  • efficient
  • affordable
  • overcrowding
  • traffic
  • infrastructure
  • investment
  • alternative
  • renewable
  • fossil fuels
  • technology
  • incentives
  • reducing
  • combating
  • environmentally friendly
  • greenhouse gases
  • global warming
What to do next:
Look at other essays: