Theoretical subjects such as mathematics and philosophy should no longer be taught in universities because most university students choose practical subjects like accounting and economics. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a public voice upholding the removal of theoretical
subjects
such
as calculus, algebra, geometry, and dialectics from the syllabus because a majority of students prefer to study practical ones.
Overall
, I tend to partly agree with
this
viewpoint. Admittedly, the status of those theoretical
subjects
has declined dramatically since the rise of neoliberalism which prioritises financial gains over spiritual pursuits.
This
social phenomenon is underpinned by recruitment standards in the current job market.
For example
, it is undeniable that those graduates who are equipped with practical skills
such
as preparing a balance sheet or analysing big data are more likely to be employed by reputed companies.
As a result
, it is a predictable outcome that most school leavers are reluctant to spend several years doing research
due to
the fear of professional incompetence after graduation.
However
, even though educational practicality is crucial to the consideration of course selection, the advantages of theoretical
subjects
should not be underestimated. In fact, engaging in a philosophical discussion may cultivate a wide range of abilities
such
as critical reflection, logical thinking, and clear speech. These skills are closely associated with professional development since they are indispensable foundations for a leadership role. As for society, the reason why a number of countries are still funding mathematical education is that their various cutting-edge technologies
such
as air-crafting and nuclear weapons rely heavily on
this
discipline.
In other words
, to maintain national power and even technological monopoly for some countries, it is unrealistic to abolish mathematics in universities. In conclusion,
while
I agree that theoretical
subjects
should not be too content-intensive because of their inability to improve professional competence, remaining these
subjects
in college is still necessary.
Submitted by zhouxianzheng056 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: