The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s live. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement ?

The most important goal of

science

should be to enhance human life. I disagree with

this

statement because I believe that focusing only on human aspects could lead to harm to our mother earth and we should consider using

science

for protecting our

nature

and other beings.

Science

is greatly improving people’s

lives

, but it takes a big cost from our living

nature

.

This

is because the improvement and development of humanity are consuming a lot of natural resources

such

as water, soil, and even our forest.

For example

, 30% of the total jungle in Indonesia had been burned down

due to

the high demand for creating agricultural crops to achieve food security.

Although

this

development greatly contributes to folks’

lives

,

this

could be harmful to planet Earth which could lead to catastrophic events.

On the other hand

, it is known that

nature

also

could improve the environment and other living things. With the support of STEM, we could easily help to preserve endangered animals.

For example

, there were only 100 pandas that roamed the land of China 10 years ago and got endangered status, but

then

the scientists assisted them and the number started to skyrocket to 1000

this

year.

Furthermore

,

science

could

also

balance the needs of boosting humans'

lives

while

also

not risking the environment,

for instance

in Indonesia there are groups of scientists who create a jungle filled with food crops for humans

while

leaving no harm to animals' houses.

To conclude

,

although

science

is boosting folks’

lives

, I believe that it would be better to preserve

nature

and help other living things other than humans to protect Mother Earth.