Home is often considered a warm harbour where our bodies and minds find respite. The question of whether the authority should provide free or affordable housing to urban residents has sparked a contentious debate. Both sides of
argument have valid points, In my view, the government and residents should share a certain level of responsibility in housing issues.
On the one hand, proponents of free state housing argue that it is pivotal to address housing inequalities. By providing affordable housing options, particularly to those from lower-income backgrounds, the state can significantly reduce disparities in living conditions and promote better standards of living, as more individuals secure stable housing, thereby enhancing their capacity to focus on other aspects of their lives,
as education and career.
approach can bolster economic growth.
, government investment in housing can stimulate the economy by creating jobs in construction, maintenance and related industries.
On the other hand
, others emphasize the importance of personal responsibility in securing housing. They argue that self-financed housing not only instils a sense of ownership but
underscores the seriousness with which individuals approach their housing needs.
stance alleviates the financial burden on taxpayers, allowing the government to allocate resources to other vital public services.
, the state provides free education and free medical care through public schools and hospitals.
In conclusion, striking a balance between these two perspectives is essential. combining governmental support and individual responsibility ensures that everyone has access to housing without undermining the significance of self-investment in one's own residence.