Aircrafts have been increasingly used to transport fruit and vegetables to some countries where such plants hardly grow or out of season. Some people consider it a good idea, but some people oppose it. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Whether moving fibre goods to places that are experiencing bad harvests by aeroplanes is an effective method or not is a controversial discussion.

This

writer contends that

this

type of

transport

is needed

due to

the speed, the finance and the convenience despite those who believe that it is not as helpful as the land and the carrying capacity. It must be acknowledged that aircraft currently are being considered to be the fastest

transport

. With their speed and airways, products can be moved from one continent to another within three days.

Therefore

, the countries that need help can receive their aid quickly and the fruits and vegetables are always in good condition.

However

Add a comma

However,

show examples

critics

justifym

Correct your spelling

argue

that in order to use planes to

transport

, more airports

needed

Wrong verb form

need

show examples

to be constructed and those can only carry a certain amount of goods.

This

is a true point, but components including myself, think that the money that will be spent on these buildings is much lower than the profits of buying more trucks. Not just that, the amount of fuel will be less used so that the governments can save more money to use for other purposes.

Furthermore

, things will be more convenient for the governments if

this

technique is applied. They can easily manage the whole process and the success proportion is much higher than usual. There will be fewer employees who are required for the

transport

. Those salaries and workers can be used for other plans. In conclusion, using helicopters to move goods is effective because of the speed, the economy and the benefits.

This

procedure works well for both countries when one is helping the other.