Some people believe that increasing tax on various industries will reduce pollution whereas others believe that there are better alternative way.Discuss both the view and give your opinion.

Reduce pollution by the way increasing

tax

Fix the agreement mistake

taxes

show examples

on various industries has become a majority topic of concern in modern society. In my opinion, I would argue against

this

as think there

alternative

Add a missing verb

are alternative

show examples

and better solutions to

this

issue. On the one hand, world environmental problems can be solved by increasing

fuel

costs. Because industries or vehicles regularly use

fuel

that releases carbon and dioxide into the air.

Therefore

, when

fuel

costs increase, people will limit their use of those fuels.

As a result

, there is a reduction in harmful emissions into the air.

For example

,

this

has been done in Frame, where the government charges a tax on any amount of

fuel

.

This

has led to the country seeing a significant drop in greenhouse gas emissions since that tax was enacted.

On the other hand

, another solution

suggest

Change the verb form

suggests

show examples

promoting clean energy sources. Renewable sources

such

as wind, solar and nuclear are

also

good at solving environmental problems as they don't produce much greenhouse gases. Some countries in the world completely depend on renewable power to meet their needs and they are doing their part to solve global environmental problems. In conclusion, increasing taxes on industries is not the best solution

instead

we should use measures

such

as clean renewable energy. Once those solutions are implemented by governments around the world, the earth will gradually be saved.