The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university .Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The table illustrates the questionnaire results about students'

fulfillment

Change the spelling

fulfilment

show examples

towards the university's infrastructure within 3 periods.

Overall

, the perception of respondents on print resources, teaching facilities, and technical quality had relatively stable satisfaction,

while

the rest aspects either faced increased or declined sentiment over a 10-year period. In 2000, assets of printers had the greatest satisfaction rate at 87%, followed by lecturing facilities at 77% and quality of technic at 65%. The acknowledgement as the best infrastructure persisted until 2010 with a slow rise of the ratings to 88%.

On the other hand

, technical quality's rating climbed slightly more than the previous category by 4% to 69% as of 2010. The facilities for teaching,

in addition

, stabilized at a similar rate throughout the 2000s.

In contrast

, electronic resources and the range of modules offered had less than half satisfaction at 45% and nearly a third respectively in the early 2000s. During the decade, the assets of electronic devices soared to just above seven out of ten in the mid-2000s and 88% in 2010, compared to the following aspect of which rating continuously dropped to precisely three in ten in 2005 and 27% by the end of 2000s.