Farmers are often not happy with good harvest. What are the reasons for this phenomenon?

Contrary to popular belief, which often assumes that plentiful cultivation is beneficial for

farmers

, agricultural workers despise abundant

harvests

owing to a couple of factors.

Firstly

, a good harvest could immensely reduce the

price

per unit, resulting in a decline in

farmers

’ income.

Second,

abundant

harvests

potentially translate to higher

production

and

storage

expenditures, which undoubtedly curb

farmers

’

profit

. These statements will be examined under closer scrutiny in

this

essay. Regarding the former, a plentiful harvest increases the quantity supplied, which could significantly deduct the

price

per unit; given that demands for these particular crops on the market remain unchanged,

this

can tremendously stultify

farmers

’

profit

as they are selling the same amount of products for a lesser

price

.

Furthermore

, a sudden dip in the

price

of a particular crop during abundant harvest seasons typically makes it harder for

this

vegetation to recover in terms of

cost

per unit in future periods.

This

phenomenon occurs

due to

the essence of customers’

behavior

Change the spelling

behaviour

show examples

as they generally do not tolerate

cost

fluctuations, especially when prices tend to rise, and could

consequently

decrease demand.

In addition

, a decline in

profit

could be financially detrimental to the

farmers

to a personal extent. The majority of

farmers

operate under the immense burden of numerous loans and debts, which often require prolonged amortization using their personal budgets to be either properly alleviated or eliminated. Granted, a declining

profit

can vastly extend the time it would take for

farmers

to repay these loans,

hence

causing more dissatisfaction. Concerning

production

and

storage

, plentiful

harvests

undeniably cause unexpected increases in raw materials of the designated products. With that being said,

production

lines and processing

facilities

possibly experience an overload of material input,

thus

potentially causing severe damage to multiple elements of

production

facilities

such

as the machinery or the health of

laborers

Change the spelling

labourers

show examples

.

Moreover

, these types of damages can be permanent and could entail critical disadvantages to the processing phases of future

harvests

. Admittedly, there are seemingly no proper solutions to the aforementioned entanglement as constructing extra

production

and

storage

facilities

, which is the most prominent candidate, has

also

been proven to cause prolonged negative impacts. First and foremost,

this

practice can raise the

cost

of

production

to tremendous heights as building proper

production

lines and

storage

houses generally costs an exorbitant amount of monetary and human resources.

This

not only drastically hinders the

overall

profit

of

farmers

but

also

possibly adds to their debt.

Secondly

, the additional

facilities

solely serve as a temporary remedy to the unforeseen surge in raw materials input and could become financial liabilities to maintain

afterward

Change the spelling

afterwards

show examples

since they are likely to be left unused during ensuing periods.

To conclude

, despite the common assumption that abundant

harvests

grant agriculturists multiple advantages,

harvests

of

this

type have a tendency to cause vast dissatisfaction to

farmers

due to

the increased

cost

of individual products

as well as

production

and

storage

.