Social
platforms have become integral to the lives of young people.
there are concerns about their impact, I firmly oppose the idea of implementing laws that restrict social
access to
above 18 years of age.
is because
restrictions could hinder the development of essential soft skills in young
,
as creativity, and limit their access to vital news sources.
with, fostering relationships in the workplace can act as a significant stress reliever, particularly in the face of heavy workloads. Frequent light-hearted interactions with colleagues provide
with an opportunity to momentarily escape the stresses associated with their
jobFix the agreement mistake
show examples
.
boost in morale enhances the
mood and motivation of employees, leading to better performance and well-being. By maintaining positive relations with peers, employees are not only more productive, but they
become more content, resulting in improved output and a positive impact on both the individual and the employer.
, social
serves as a crucial source of news and information for young people. Limiting their access to
platform could hinder their awareness of current affairs and social issues. The ability to stay informed about local and global events is essential for the younger generation to develop a sense of responsibility towards their society and nation.
, when a natural disaster occurs in a specific city, young
often learn about it through social
.
awareness leads them to organize charity events and actively contribute to relief efforts,
shaping a generation
not only aware of ongoing issues but
willing to make a real impact.
In conclusion,
concerns exist regarding the effects of social
on young
, imposing restrictions on its use may not be the best approach.
measures could limit the development of essential soft skills and diminish the awareness of current events among the youth.
, it is essential for parents and guardians to continuously monitor and guide young people in their social
usage to ensure a balanced approach.