Details of politicians’ private lives should not be published in newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is being argued that
details
of political leaders’
lives
should not be printed in newspapers. I strongly disagree with
this
statement because the public gets inspired by their leader to do positive things in their
lives
and it can be taken as a clue
while
doing investigations during scams. First of all, citizens follow what their leaders do in their personal
lives
.
In other words
, many politicians do good things in their personal
lives
and when they get published, people
also
follow them.
For instance
, pictures of Prime Minister Narinder Modi helping his mother
while
she was eating were shared in many newspapers and have inspired a lot of Indians to respect their parents.
Thus
printing
details
of politicians’ private
lives
motivates citizens in a positive way.
Secondly
, if people have
details
of the families of politicians, it can be used during the investigation of scams.
This
is because most of the scams include family members of political leaders, and if their
details
were available publicly
then
it can be used by authorities to find the main culprit.
For example
, in the Indian Railway scam in 2002, a newspaper article gave a clue to the police that the brother of the railway minister was the main culprit.
This
is why printing personal
lives
of politicians should be printed since it can help authorities during investigations. In conclusion, it is often argued that political leaders’
lives
should not be published in printed media. I completely disagree with
this
statement because it inspires citizens to follow the good traits of their leaders and it can help authorities during the search for political financial frauds.
Submitted by KaranAwal15 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
The introduction provides a clear opinion and the body paragraphs support it with relevant examples. However, the conclusion could be strengthened by summarizing the main points and reaffirming the opinion.
coherence and cohesion
The essay follows a typical structure of introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, the logical progression of ideas within paragraphs and between them could be improved by using more cohesive devices and linking words.
lexical resource
The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary and uses relevant words and phrases to express ideas. To improve, consider varying sentence structures and using more sophisticated vocabulary to enhance the lexical resource.
grammatical range
The essay displays a fairly wide range of grammar structures and there are only a few errors. However, to achieve a higher score, aim for more complexity in sentence structures and pay attention to subject-verb agreement and tense consistency.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • intrusion
  • accountability
  • transparency
  • sensationalism
  • privacy
  • public interest
  • collateral damage
  • precedent
  • responsible journalism
  • exploitation
  • democratic processes
  • media culture
  • balance
What to do next:
Look at other essays: