It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important. Do you agree or disagree?

It is commonly argued that protecting

wildlife

is being invested too much by the governments

while

there are other problems that need to be addressed. Personally, I can neither completely agree nor disagree with

this

statement for a variety of reasons. I partly agree that

wildlife

has an important role in our lives.

This

means that if

wildlife

is protected, it will contribute to ecological balance in the environment. In fact, protecting animals helps prevent the extinction of many rare species and provides abundant sources like food and leather,...

For example

, as studied by the WWF, the loss of many animal species in the Amazon rainforest has resulted in serious impacts on climate change, causing natural disasters and species extinction over the

last

10 years.

On the other hand

, I disagree that the government has spent too much national budget on

wildlife

and ignored other problems. In fact, the infrastructure of schools or hospitals has been developed and renewed each year.

This

is because governments

also

spend money to upgrade and fix the problems in parallel with protecting the environment.

For instance

, in Vietnam, the government always gives some new programs for education to extend knowledge for students and pupils.

Besides

, they

also

encourage citizens to grow more trees, collect trash, organize lots of competitions about protecting the environment, etc. In conclusion,

although

some governments can spend a huge amount of finance to protect

wildlife

, I’m convinced that other authorities

also

care for other social issues

such

as education, and health,...