The ever-evolving state of technology comes with mass market adoption that
haveChange the verb form
show examples
allowed itself to be accessible to anyone of all ages, including
children
.
This
level of mass adoption
as well as
proliferationAdd an article
the proliferation
a proliferation
show examples
of technological capabilities moves at a speed
that is
forced to be reckoned with, and
due to
this
, some well-meaning
parents
are of the opinion that
children
should have
a Remove the article
show examples
limited
access
to the use of mobile phones,
while
the rest have no qualms about their
children
owning the very same device.
Parents
who are against the idea of
children
having ownership of their own mobile phones have well-meaning intentions. It is usually
due to
trust
, not because they don't
trust
their
children
, but simply
thatCorrect word choice
show examples
they do not
trust
what the internet has to offer
for Change preposition
show examples
them. Technology embedded in mobile phones, in its purest form, is a state of
artAdd an article
show examples
device that allows people to connect to people across
boundaries and look up information in a
that one would likely not encounter as easily in the libraries. But it would be naive to not
acknowledge the dangers of
this
much accessibility through the touch of your fingertips
such
as misleading information,
exposure
to adult content, and a mix of other contents that kids are better off not knowing at that stage of their life. It should be said that as with all dangers,
exposure
to
theseCorrect determiner usage
show examples
content and information is perfectly mitigatable, with the right precaution and adult supervision. The need for constant direct safeguarding and physical monitoring is exactly why some
parents
are reluctant to assign these rectangular devices for their
children
to have complete
access
and freedom
forChange preposition
show examples
.
However
, on the
flipsideCorrect your spelling
show examples
of things, there is another demography of
parents
who allow
such
devices to be owned by
children
. Often deemed as a callous choice, the decision to provide
one'sChange preposition
show examples
children
areCorrect subject-verb agreement
show examples
usually based
off ofChange preposition
show examples
the fact that the
parents
trust
that their
children
will be able to learn and be more agile by virtue of
exposure
. By providing their
children
with the platform to explore and see for themselves,
as well as
with appropriate safeguarding, little by little it is the parent's hope that their kids will be able to independently course through their life and self-correct their life trajectory from a self-developed ability to tell right from wrong. And from
this
judgment, what might seem like
a Remove the article
show examples
tactless counterintuitive parenting could actually be productive in allowing
children
to learn the ropes by themselves.
All in all, regardless if a parent chooses to provide their
children
access
to mobile devices or not is merely a question of how little or much safeguarding is necessary when it comes to technological
exposure
for their
offspringsFix the agreement mistake
show examples
. I am of the opinion that
atChange preposition
show examples
this
day and age,
children
who have developed the ability to read, speak, and comprehend other people's words should be allowed the privilege of owning a mobile phone. Especially with the inherent safeguards that a lot of technological developers have put in place in their respective
systemFix the agreement mistake
show examples
, technology can arguably provide
children
access
to more good than harm.