Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Even though smoking is fashionable among the young and old today, it has detrimental effects on society. Smoking in public has a negative impact on the health of
smokers
, and those around them, not only that but
also
, on the economy of the country.
Therefore
, I wholeheartedly agree with banning smoking in open spaces.
First,
when considering the health issues caused by smoking in public spaces, researchers have proven that both
smokers
and non-
smokers
have the same risk, or passive
smokers
have a higher risk than
smokers
.
For instance
, pregnant women who hang out in public areas
such
as public transport, bus stations, markets, and restaurants inhale polluted air emitted by
smokers
, which affects both
herself
Correct pronoun usage
themselves
show examples
and the foetus through the placenta. It causes
for
Change preposition
apply
show examples
birth defects.
According to
the latest health statistics, lung cancer is the second most common cancer worldwide. Smoking is the leading cause of carcinoma in the respiratory system.
In addition
, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and
bronchitis like
Add a hyphen
bronchitis-like
show examples
diseases are aggravated by inhaling cigarette smoke.
Due to
this
, the government must invest more funds to treat lung diseases.
Moreover
, when smoking is seen in public, teenagers tend to experiment with it. It is responsible for a collapse in education, and it
also
indirectly affects the future of the country.
To sum up
, taking
in to
Correct your spelling
into
show examples
account
above
Correct article usage
the above
show examples
, it is crucial that smoking be outlawed in public places. In my opinion, smoking should be prohibited in public areas by law and enforced against those who violate it. Banning
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
smoking in public is a social and national investment.
Submitted by udesudeshikakalpani11 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Task Achievement
The essay provides a clear response to the task question, presenting a strong argument in agreement with the banning of smoking in public places. However, the examples could be more varied and specific.
Coherence and Cohesion
The logical structure of the essay is generally sound, but there are some issues with coherence and cohesion. The introduction and conclusion are present, but the paragraph development could be improved for clearer organization and smoother transitions between ideas.
Lexical Resource
The range of vocabulary used in the essay is generally sufficient, demonstrating an adequate grasp of formal vocabulary and some attempt at using a variety of words and phrases. However, more sophisticated and precise vocabulary could be employed to enhance the essay's lexical resource.
Grammatical Range
The grammatical range in the essay is mostly accurate, with varied sentence structures and adequate use of tenses. However, there are some errors in sentence structure, word choice, and punctuation that affect the overall clarity and accuracy of expression.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: