Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Even though smoking is fashionable among the young and old today, it has detrimental effects on society. Smoking in public has a negative impact on the health of
smokers
, and those around them, not only that but also
, on the economy of the country. Therefore
, I wholeheartedly agree with banning smoking in open spaces.
First,
when considering the health issues caused by smoking in public spaces, researchers have proven that both smokers
and non-smokers
have the same risk, or passive smokers
have a higher risk than smokers
. For instance
, pregnant women who hang out in public areas such
as public transport, bus stations, markets, and restaurants inhale polluted air emitted by smokers
, which affects both herself
and the foetus through the placenta. It causes Correct pronoun usage
themselves
for
birth defects.
Change preposition
apply
According to
the latest health statistics, lung cancer is the second most common cancer worldwide. Smoking is the leading cause of carcinoma in the respiratory system. In addition
, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and bronchitis like
diseases are aggravated by inhaling cigarette smoke. Add a hyphen
bronchitis-like
Due to
this
, the government must invest more funds to treat lung diseases. Moreover
, when smoking is seen in public, teenagers tend to experiment with it. It is responsible for a collapse in education, and it also
indirectly affects the future of the country.
To sum up
, taking in to
account Correct your spelling
into
above
, it is crucial that smoking be outlawed in public places. In my opinion, smoking should be prohibited in public areas by law and enforced against those who violate it. Banning Correct article usage
the above
the
smoking in public is a social and national investment.Correct article usage
apply
Submitted by udesudeshikakalpani11 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task response
The essay demonstrates a limited understanding of the topic and lacks depth in addressing the prompt. The response does not fully engage with the arguments for and against the ban on smoking in public places. More detailed analysis and balanced consideration of different perspectives is needed.
coherence and cohesion
The essay lacks a clear and cohesive organizational structure. The introduction does not effectively set up the discussion, and the conclusion is abrupt. Additionally, the linking of ideas within paragraphs is weak, leading to a lack of coherence in the presentation of ideas.
lexical resource
The lexical resource in the essay is adequate, but there is a need for more variety and precision in vocabulary. The use of linking words and cohesive devices is inconsistent, and there are some awkward expressions that detract from the overall clarity and fluency of the writing.
grammatical range
The essay exhibits a range of grammatical structures, but there are several errors in sentence construction, verb tense consistency, and word choice. The use of punctuation and sentence complexity could also be improved to enhance the overall grammatical range.