Houses are the basic needs of every resident.
People
with limited opportunities should be provided with free housing. I totally disagree with Use synonyms
this
statement, Linking Words
due to
many consequences.
Linking Words
Firstly
, lazy Linking Words
people
can use Use synonyms
this
opportunity for their own purposes. Today, there are many unemployed Linking Words
people
who do not want to work and earn money. These Use synonyms
people
will use facilities Use synonyms
such
as free housing, Linking Words
whereas
administration finances will not be enough for other needs. Linking Words
For example
, most of all countries in the world have more than 30 per cent of Linking Words
people
out of work. Under these circumstances, poor Use synonyms
people
which poor because of their limited abilities like being ill or having too many children in their families could not use these opportunities. At the same time, lazy Use synonyms
people
will enjoy and will not know what they have done.
Use synonyms
Secondly
, governments` wallets will become emptier. If there were about a million citizens in the queue to get already-paid homes, the country`s economy would have significantly decreased. Linking Words
For instance
, a recent exploration has shown how much money has been spent government on maintaining a good life level for the local Linking Words
people
. It has indicated a huge amount of spending, just about 40 per cent of Use synonyms
overall
finances. Linking Words
Consequently
, spending a lot of money on citizens is not the best idea.
In conclusion, I think, countries should invent a new way to solve Linking Words
this
problem. Linking Words
Due to
that, they need to save their finances for Linking Words
an
Remove the article
apply
another field
like the environmental and the diplomatic problemsFix the agreement mistake
other fields
ielts8bandplus