As housing is a basic need for people, the government should provide free housing for everyone who cannot afford it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Houses are the basic needs of every resident.
People
with limited opportunities should be provided with free housing. I totally disagree with
this
statement,
due to
many consequences.
Firstly
, lazy
people
can use
this
opportunity for their own purposes. Today, there are many unemployed
people
who do not want to work and earn money. These
people
will use facilities
such
as free housing,
whereas
administration finances will not be enough for other needs.
For example
, most of all countries in the world have more than 30 per cent of
people
out of work. Under these circumstances, poor
people
which poor because of their limited abilities like being ill or having too many children in their families could not use these opportunities. At the same time, lazy
people
will enjoy and will not know what they have done.
Secondly
, governments` wallets will become emptier. If there were about a million citizens in the queue to get already-paid homes, the country`s economy would have significantly decreased.
For instance
, a recent exploration has shown how much money has been spent government on maintaining a good life level for the local
people
. It has indicated a huge amount of spending, just about 40 per cent of
overall
finances.
Consequently
, spending a lot of money on citizens is not the best idea. In conclusion, I think, countries should invent a new way to solve
this
problem.
Due to
that, they need to save their finances for
an
Remove the article
apply
show examples
another field
Fix the agreement mistake
other fields
show examples
like the environmental and the diplomatic problems
Submitted by ielts8bandplus on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Task Achievement
The essay lacks a clear opinion and does not effectively address the prompt. It is necessary to express a clear and consistent viewpoint while addressing the question fully.
Coherence and Cohesion
The logical structure of the essay is somewhat fragmented and lacks clear organization. The introduction and conclusion are present but lack development. Ideas are not cohesive enough and lack effective linking.
Lexical Resource
The vocabulary used in the essay is limited and lacks variety. There are also instances of inappropriate word choice and awkward phrasing. The essay would benefit from a wider range of vocabulary and more precise use of language.
Grammatical Range
The essay demonstrates a limited range of grammatical structures, with frequent errors in sentence structure and word form. There are also issues with verb tense consistency and punctuation. A more varied and accurate use of grammar is needed.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • Social safety net
  • Economic stability
  • Unemployment benefits
  • Financial security
  • Economic downturn
  • Poverty
  • Stimulate the economy
  • Job seeking
  • Dependency culture
  • Fiscal responsibility
  • Government expenditure
  • Labor market
  • Fraud
  • Welfare abuse
  • Quality of life
  • Budget constraints
  • Economic strain
  • Public funds
  • Employment incentives
What to do next:
Look at other essays: