In the future, it seems more difficult to live on Earth. Some people think more money should be spent researching other planets, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Many people believe investing money in
space
science may guarantee human’s
survivor in the future. In my opinion, I completely disagree with Change noun form
human
this
statement for numerous reasons.
Firstly
, the most significant issue with this
plan is the limitation of human insights about universe
and Correct article usage
the universe
space
exploration. Because of special conditions, physic
, which has been formed and improved for millions of years does not work in Fix the agreement mistake
physics
the
Correct article usage
apply
space
requiring scientists to rebuild all the physical equations and formulars to broaden their knowledge about universe
. One of the most prominent examples is Einstein who denied the foundation of Add an article
the universe
physic
by claiming that time may change to guarantee the velocity of light, Fix the agreement mistake
physics
however
his opinions could just be recognized 50 years after his death by experimental methods by the scientists’ community. Add the comma(s)
however,
Consequently
, allocating a huge budget without any in-dept
knowledge might Correct your spelling
in-depth
experience
massive risks, which Verb problem
cause
instead
, may be used for other practical solutions such
as improving healthcare infrastructure or aiding potential environmentally friendly breakthroughs like hybrid cars and wave energy.
Secondly
, even passing all those challenges, these breakthrough
in planet study can be counterproductive. Since the majority of planets in Fix the agreement mistake
breakthroughs
solar
system Correct article usage
the solar
contained
a huge amount of metals like nickel or bronze which is indispensable for Wrong verb form
contain
the
heavy industry, Correct article usage
apply
whereas
the breakthroughs of space
technology such
as satellites or space
bases might be exploited for military purpose
. Fix the agreement mistake
purposes
Therefore
, it may be a springboard for wars and conflicts among mutual countries, especially the super nations for obtaining these planets’ resources, which is predicted to drive human
to the verge of extinction rather than Fix the agreement mistake
humans
surviving
. To illustrate, Replace the word
survival
Antarctic
can be seen as a prevalent example Correct article usage
the Antarctic
as
Change preposition
of
it’s
high oil reserve and Correct your spelling
its
it’s
position Correct your spelling
its
according to
international agreement as a public venue, but there have been 95 conflicts caused by 13 nations in 34 years; planets like Mars with similar conditions may witnessed the same phenomenon but with a bigger scale and fiercer features.
In conclusion, the
investment in planets science can be regarded as risky and Correct article usage
apply
exorbitance
Replace the word
exorbitant
resulted
from human Wrong verb form
resulting
limitation
. Fix the agreement mistake
limitations
In addition
, this
allocation, instead
of finding a way for human
Fix the agreement mistake
humans
survive
might exacerbate the issues by stimulating global-scale and tremendous wars.Fix the infinitive
to survive
Submitted by yeshomeclass on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Ensure that each paragraph focuses on a single main idea and that the ideas within the paragraph are clearly connected and easy to follow.
task achievement
Develop the main points more fully with a wider range of supporting details and pertinent examples to strengthen the argument, as this provides a richer and more convincing response.