There is an opinion, that 3D printed meal is the best way to feed our overpopulated species.

There is an opinion, that 3D printed meal is the best way to feed our overpopulated species. In
this
essay, both arguments that support and ones, that oppose, will be discussed and compared.
Firstly
, any 3D technology is able to be produced quickly and in large quantities.
For example
,
while
a normal house, would take months to build, a 3D-printed building of the same size can be made in 48 hours, making
this
method very popular with tens of thousands of these structures being made already.
This
experience can be transferred to the food industry by producing millions of tons of meals every day.
In addition
,
due to
being manufactured in bulk, the production of 3D-manufactured dishes will probably cost a very small amount of money and,
thus
, it would be possible to sell it for cheap as well, making it affordable to almost every person on the Earth.
Therefore
, theoretically, 3D-made food can be mass-produced to feed as many people, as there are needed to be fed.
On the other hand
, the ingredients used for the 3D technology are heavily processed into a paste. For instance, in order to convert a raw good into
this
form, it needs to undergo a very high pressure and temperature.
This
may eliminate most of the nutrients, making the manufactured food nutritionally obsolete in comparison to non-processed alternatives.
Therefore
, if a person eats only 3D-made dishes, they are likely going to end up being malnourished.
Furthermore
, if a child does not receive enough vitamins, proteins, fats and other necessary growth nutrients, their body will not develop properly,
for example
, they may end up being shorter than potentially could have ended up being.
Overall
, I do not consider 3D-printed goods as being the best way to solve the potential world hunger.
Although
I do not deny that it is possible to feed everyone on our planet with only
this
method, the solution is very likely going to create another problem - global malnutrition which may result in horrible consequences that may
last
for generations.
Submitted by alexander.vectorgs on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
Ensure a clear overall progression of ideas throughout the essay. Use cohesive devices appropriately but avoid overuse, which can make the text feel mechanical.
coherence cohesion
Introduce the topic more clearly in the introduction and provide a clear opinion or stance on it. Summarise the main points more effectively in the conclusion and offer a more decisive viewpoint.
task achievement
Provide more developed and extended examples to support your points. Make sure the examples are directly relevant to the main point of the paragraph and they fully illustrate it.
task achievement
While the response addresses the task, it should be more complete by including a more balanced discussion of the arguments. Include more persuasive and detailed arguments to strengthen the position taken.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: