Some people believe that
governmentCorrect article usage
show examples
overspend their
budget
on projects to preserve
wildlife
,
while
the Correct article usage
show examples
others argue that there are more important
problems
to be focused on. I support the notion that
governmentCorrect article usage
show examples
should not spend too much money to protect nature
it still has
beneficialReplace the word
show examples
.
On the one hand,
although
preserving
wildlife
has some
beneficialReplace the word
show examples
such
as protecting natural resources and keep balancing
a Remove the article
show examples
wildlife
, basic
still become a root cause in so many countries these days. Healthcare and education in Indonesia,
for example
, are the
two-mostCorrect your spelling
show examples
problematic sectors for so long. Even national authorities had been delegating the task to the
localFix the agreement mistake
show examples
for ensuringChange preposition
show examples
equal distribution, but they are still dealing with the two until today.
On the other hand
, overspending
budget
on
wildlife
project cause less
focusedReplace the word
show examples
on other
problems
such
as lack of allocation to those. There has to be
rightAdd an article
show examples
amount of proportion so that they can allocate and spend appropriately.
For instance
,
governmentAdd an article
show examples
must extrapolate the impact on
budgetAdd an article
show examples
that they spend over the years ahead and align it with the national targets, so that they can shift to more important
problems
as well as
reduce the
budget
spending on
wildlife
.
In conclusion, overspending
budgetCorrect article usage
show examples
on
wildlife
overlookChange the verb form
show examples
other
problems
that are more important. As a suggestion,
governmentAdd an article
show examples
must have proper allocation
besides
wildlife
projectFix the agreement mistake
show examples
, and extrapolate the impact produced on
budgetAdd an article
show examples
they spend years ahead.