Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children). Do you agree or disagree?

Individuals have different views about implementing complementary

community

service to the school curriculum.

While

some

people

argue that it's not required to do free service in the neighbourhood, I think it's a necessity because it helps kids to gain mental growth and certain

people

's skills at the school level. On the one hand, some will say that children are going to schools to study and not to work for the

community

at

this

stage of their life and these activities will affect their educational abilities. To elaborate

this

, many assume and say these kinds of social activities will ruin their concentration towards studies and

this

will eventually affect their growth in education.

for example

, teenagers may get too focused on playing and teaching sports to the younger children and neglect their studies which leads to them failing and not promoting to higher classes.

On the other hand

, I believe that having

community

service as a part of the student routine in schools will help kids to gain enormous

people

skills.

As a result

, pupils who are engaged in helping the neighbourhood will get to know how to behave with elders with respect and how to treat yours with the right attitude.

This

will help them in future to get

along with

different kinds of

people

that they are about to meet in future. I believe that having activities that engage with the

community

will help in developing multiple important skills from the school age.

Although

some will say it's not entirely relevant to the youngsters.