Some people think that an international car-free day is an effective way to reduce air pollution. Others think there are more effective ways to do this. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion

Nowadays, air pollution has become a great concern as it is increasing global warming . A few masses suggest that a care-free day should be kept on a global level to decrease air damage,

while

others believe that there are some better alternative measures available to tackle

this

issue. In

this

essay, I will discuss both views in detail and provide supporting examples to prove the latter statement takes precedence.

To begin

with, it is obvious that on an international car-free day, the citizens will not take their personal cars out on the roads, which automatically will result in fewer numbers of vehicles in the city. And the lesser the card on the road lesser the emission of toxic gases into the environment.

However

,

this

idea is illogical because it will create difficulties for people in an emergency to go out in their cars.

Also

, the public transportations may get overcrowded

as a consequence

is

this

approach.

On the other hand

, there are some more effective solutions to

this

phenomenon

such

as carpooling.

In other words

, a group of 4-5 people who have a similar destination can travel together in a single vehicle.

This

way, air pollution can be limited to some extent.

Furthermore

, another important step that can be taken by the ministry is to put some restrictions on the industries that discharge harmful gases into nature.

For example

, authorities can charge fines to those factories that release

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

carbon dioxide more than the normal limit.

According to

me, the idea of the international no-car day is absurd and there are plenty of other solutions to save

Correct article usage

the

show examples

atmosphere quality. These include the car-sharing trend and strict regulations by the government.