The most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is argued that enhancing human

quality

of life should be the primary objective of scientific

development

. I strongly agree with

this

statement, as many innovations are designed to fulfil individuals' needs. In recent years, technological

development

has contributed to improving the

quality

of human lives. From changing lifestyles more effectively and efficiently to improving the country's economy through digital business activities.

For instance

, e-commerce in Indonesia has experienced significant growth after adopting technology to provide their systems and help them expand their markets.

In addition

, it

also

has an impact on the

quality

of the economy, not only for themselves but

also

for those around them, as even those who live in rural areas can get a chance to open a business through e-commerce.

Furthermore

, the research and

development

field has

also

presented various innovations in the educational system. The world is growing faster;

therefore

, students should learn more skills to improve their lives.

On the other hand

, educators are responsible for improving the

quality

of the curriculum through the analysis

and

Correct word choice

apply

show examples

of data regarding the student's needs in the future. Finland,

for example

, has applied student learning assessments from various qualitative methods and soft skills

development

. The result is a success in improving the mindset,

quality

Correct word choice

and quality

show examples

of learning, and influencing the

quality

of developed countries. In conclusion, science should be proven by how an individual's life can be better. Technology and R&D areas are the ones in science that are facilitated and become a bridge for humans to change their

quality

of life.

Therefore

, any knowledge and skill should be used to deliver long-term benefits.