Death penalty is still practiced in jurisdiction system of many countries. Some people believe that this type of punishment should be abolished. However, others are of opposite opinion. Discuss both sides of this debate and give your own opinion.
In the realm of global jurisprudence, the contentious practice of the
death
penalty
persists across the jurisdictional systems of numerous countries. The ongoing debate hinges on whether this
form of punishment should be abolished, with one faction arguing against it due to
ethical and practical concerns, while
the opposing side asserts the necessity of retaining capital punishment in extreme cases. This
essay seeks to explore these divergent perspectives, offering an analysis of the arguments on both sides before concluding with a personal stance on the matter.
Supporters of abolishing the death
penalty
highlight its ethical and systemic shortcomings. For instance
, the execution of individuals, even those convicted of heinous crimes like terrorism or serial murder, perpetuates a cycle of violence without addressing the root causes. Moreover
, the potential for judicial errors leading to the wrongful execution of innocents raises profound moral questions about the viability of such
a punitive system. Instead
, they advocate for a justice system that prioritizes rehabilitation and societal harmony over vengeance.
Conversely
, proponents of the death
penalty
argue for its retention in extreme cases, such
as serial murder or terrorism. They posit that certain crimes demand the most severe consequences as a deterrent and a means to protect society
. In their view, capital punishment ensures that society
is rid of individuals deemed beyond rehabilitation, serving both as retribution and a preventive measure against potential future atrocities.
In conclusion, the death
penalty
debate encompasses complex ethical, moral, and societal considerations. While
opponents emphasize the need for a more humane and rehabilitative approach to justice, proponents highlight the gravity of certain crimes and the necessity for stringent consequences. Personally, I align with the abolitionist perspective, believing that a society
's commitment to justice should not be synonymous with the act of taking human life. This
nuanced and compassionate approach is vital for fostering a society
that values both accountability and rehabilitation.Submitted by aab705041 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
You have demonstrated good logical structure in your essay, with a clear introduction, development of arguments, and conclusion. To further improve, ensure each paragraph has a central idea and that paragraphs are linked effectively with a variety of cohesive devices.
task achievement
You have addressed the task well, provided a clear position throughout the essay, and concluded with your own opinion, which is commendable. However, to push your score higher, consider incorporating more specific, detailed examples to support your arguments, which would add depth to your analysis and further engage the reader.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?