Death penalty is still practiced in jurisdiction system of many countries. Some people believe that this type of punishment should be abolished. However, others are of opposite opinion. Discuss both sides of this debate and give your own opinion.
In the realm of global jurisprudence, the controversial practice of the
death
penalty persists across the jurisdictional systems in many countries. There are those who believe that this
form of punishment should be abolished, while
others disagree. I believe that both arguments offer valid points, however
, the need for an analysis of the difference of opinions is important before concluding with a personal stance on the matter.
According to
some people's perspectives who apply abolishing, the demise of forfeiture highlights ethical and systemic shortcomings. They contend that the execution of individuals, even those convicted of heinous crimes, such
as murder, with decease punishment is not a deterrent because the criminals do not carefully weigh the differences between a possible execution and life in prison before they act and there is no conclusive proof that said the death
penalty acts as a better deterrent. Furthermore
, the death
warrant is not fair for innocent in juridical error. If it can be shown that someone is innocent, a governor should grant clemency and spare the person such
as gravity. Instead
, they advocate for a justice system that prioritizes rehabilitation and societal harmony over vengeance.
Conversely
, another perspective argues for death
sentence retention in extreme cases, such
as serial murder or terrorism. They posit that certain crimes demand the most severe consequences as a deterrent and a means to protect society. In their view, capital punishment ensures that society is rid of individuals deemed beyond rehabilitation, serving both as retribution and a preventive measure against potential future atrocities.
To sum up
, the death
penalty debate encompasses complex ethical, moral, and societal aspect
. Fix the agreement mistake
aspects
While
one side prioritizes more humanity and the need for rehabilitation or gravity
approach to justice, and other side highlights the necessity for stringent consequences. In my opinion, a community's commitment to justice should not be synonymous with the act of taking human life and the safety of the nation can be assured without using the loss of life discipline.Correct article usage
a gravity
Submitted by doradebora88 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Your essay has a discernible structure with basic paragraphing, however, the logical flow between ideas needs improvement. Ensure that each paragraph has a clear main idea and that subsequent sentences build on that idea coherently. Also, work on using transitional phrases more effectively to connect paragraphs and individual sentences within a paragraph, facilitating a smoother reading experience.
task achievement
Make sure to fully address all parts of the task. The introduction briefly mentions both views, but the body paragraphs do not explore these perspectives in sufficient depth. Include clear, specific examples to support your points and help bring your arguments to life. Develop your conclusion by providing a brief summary of your arguments and stating your opinion more clearly, rather than introducing new ideas.