Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is argued that the government should invest in railways

instead

Linking Words

of roads.

Although

Linking Words

some people could think that roadways are essential, I completely agree with

this

Linking Words

point of view, because rail lines are more environmentally friendly and they could prevent traffic congestion. Funding railways could develop green travel. Primarily, investing in underground or tram lines could reduce carbon emissions. A good example of

this

Linking Words

is that, if politicians invest in subways or trains, people will use more frequently public transportation.

Furthermore

Linking Words

, wider and more efficient transportation services could reduce the number of commuters who drive to work.

Instead

Linking Words

, investing in roads could improve the use of private vehicles and it could produce more and more pollution. An efficient transportation system could cut down traffic jams.

Firstly

Linking Words

, since more tram and subway lines will be available, the number of cars on the streets and highways is going to be lower.

For instance

Linking Words

, people will not be stuck on the road during peak hours.

In addition

Linking Words

, trains typically have a higher capacity rather than vehicles. They can carry a large number of passengers in a shorter time rather than private transport.

Additionally

Linking Words

, they can operate at relatively high speeds, making them a time-efficient alternative for certain travel routes. Once again,

this

Linking Words

could reduce the impact of congestion.

To sum up

Linking Words

, the government should invest in railways

instead

Linking Words

of roads. For one thing, better services encourage eco-friendly travel, for another they play a crucial role in the amount of traffic on the streets.