In many countries, traditional foods are being replaced by international fast foods. This is having a negative effect on both families and societies. To what extent do you agree or disagree

ot of nations, domestic cuisines are not widely used,
while
international junk foods have been broadly used.
Although
some people believe that
this
proliferation brought about some drawbacks, I am inclined to think neither.
To begin
with,the spreading of international restaurants like K.F.C contributes to some positive impacts for both families and societies.To illustrate
this
, these kinds of outlets pay high taxes in foreign currency.
Consequently
, many fiscal difficulties can be hindered
such
as inflation fights,debts and deterioration in the cost of living. Take my country as a clear example, on account of these sorts of luncheonettes several of the economic crises were handled.
Therefore
, ten global diners will be established in the near future because of the given justifications. Regarding families, a lot of meals are offered at a reasonable cost,so it can be very handy for the public.
On the other hand
, traditional diets necessitate some complex manipulations.
As a result
, their condiments ,ingredients and requirements are not as cheap as international restaurants. Not only
this
but
also
it is very convenient to pick up your favourite meal within relatively a short period of time. In spite of
this
, the preparation of municipal meals requires much time
as well as
effort. So as to the given reasons, a great deal of families do not get
along with
local cuisines.
For instance
, in the Gulf spot, because of the aforementioned clarifications, international dining rooms are on an upward trend. In a nutshell, after a thorough analysis of the given topic ,it is predicted that global cuisines brought about positive impacts more than local foods
according to
the illustrated justifications.
Hence
, these clarifications make me believe that the advantages of domestic meals are not as high as international foods.
Submitted by nadeenelkenawy4425 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
Ensure that the introduction and conclusion are clearly defined and delineate your stand on the argument. Present a balanced view if you neither agree nor disagree, but make it clear.
coherence cohesion
Your main points need to be better structured and connected through the use of cohesive devices. Logical sequencing of ideas will improve clarity.
task achievement
Make sure to address the prompt directly and state your position. Cover all parts of the question and provide relevant examples that directly support your view.
task achievement
Your ideas are understandable but should be expressed more clearly. Simplifying complex sentences and ensuring grammatical accuracy can improve comprehensibility.
task achievement
Use specific examples to substantiate your arguments, and make sure they are clearly relevant to the topic at hand.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • cultural identity
  • heritage
  • obesity
  • diabetes
  • globalization
  • nutrient-rich
  • bonding
  • local cuisine
  • fast food chains
  • convenience
  • processed ingredients
  • sustainability
  • culinary traditions
  • mass-produced
  • environmental degradation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: