Some people believe governments should spend money in saving languages of few speakers from dying out completely. Others think this is a waste of financial resources. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

People have different views about whether municipal
governments
should spend financial budgets on protecting rare
languages
.
While
it is important for authorities to protect the endangering
languages
from dying out, I completely agree that there are alternative methods
instead
of wasting economic resources. On the one hand, we have to admit that saving endangering dialects is significantly indispensable and has various advantages. The primary benefit is that preventing the extinction of dialects is conducive to boosting cultural diversity.
This
is because
languages
are the symbols of culture, which provides opportunities for people to acknowledge the traditions and customs of certain areas.
Secondly
, saving
languages
probably makes it accessible for people to know the local stories of rural areas, which can encourage the development of poor districts and
thus
boost the local economy to some degree.
Therefore
, the preservation of rare
languages
is beneficial to both cultural diversity and the local economy. Regardless of the arguments mentioned above, I consider that expenses on
language
protection should be limited.
Firstly
,
governments
should spend money on the most imperative fields,
such
as education, tourism, transportation and so on.
This
is because investments in these regions are more essential than in
language
protection.
Secondly
, authorities are supposed to invest their financial budgets in higher profit programs, which makes it possible for them to obtain higher incomes within a limited period and mitigate their financial stress.
Thirdly
, there are numerous alternative methods of saving rare
languages
,
such
as setting optional
language
courses, encouraging
language
protection activities in school and so on.
Thus
,
governments
can protect their rare
languages
and spend their money more profitably.
Overall
,
while
investing money in saving rare
languages
is indispensable, I believe that
governments
should save their budgets and protect them by other means.
Submitted by 609553855 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Ensure that both sides of the argument are discussed equally and avoid leaning heavily towards one side before the conclusion.
task response
Support your main points with more detailed examples to strengthen the argument.
coherence cohesion
Maintain a clear and logical flow between ideas and paragraphs using a variety of linking words and transitions.
coherence cohesion
Endeavor to have a clear topic sentence for each paragraph, followed by supporting sentences and a conclusive sentence to enhance paragraph structure.
coherence cohesion
Be mindful of the essay's balance; ensure the introduction and conclusion are succinct but also adequately mirror each other and the body content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: