Towns and cities are attractive places. Some people suggest that the government should spend money putting in more works of art like paintings and statues to make them better to live in. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

A major part of the World living in

cities

and towns for almost a century. Because of that some individuals support the idea of the government spending money on the

art

of painting and

statues

to make

cities

better. From my perspective, I believe

this

idea has several beneficial impacts.

To begin

with, In my opinion,

art

forms

such

as paintings and

statues

make

cities

more liveable and durable. To give an example, in some ancient

cities

for instance

cairo or Athena there are elegant and chich

statues

and

this

leads to remembered centers in those

cities

.

Secondly

, thanks to the modern world, communities will continue to live in

cities

or towns, and paintings or

statues

will be a sensible investment. On the one hand, there is a relationship between happiness and

art

. Almost every person goes to work or school every morning and

art

can help them to be happy because living aesthetic city has

this

kind of skill. To illustrate

this

, Rome has a great example of

statues

and the people who live in Rome may be happy to see them every day.

To sum up

, living in a city that has paintings or

statues

can help with happiness and permanence for those who live there.

Art

is a functional discipline and

i

Change the capitalization

I

show examples

believe governments should invest

this

Change preposition

in this

show examples

discipline to make

cities

better to live in