These days, many countries around the world provide free
for their
.
development may seem like a purely positive one, but it comes with disadvantages as well.
essay will discuss one important benefit of adopting a gratuitous
for higher
and a problem that
a
can sometimes cause.
A clear advantage of free
is that many
who could
not attend
financial restrictions can
enrollChange the spelling
show examples
in a degree program and have a chance to improve their standard of living.
, a free
can level the playing field for prospective
from different backgrounds, especially in countries where
costs are extremely high. In my home country of
USACorrect article usage
show examples
, many
of lower economic status choose not to get a degree precisely because the
is quite expensive. By the time
complete their degree programs, they often face mountains of debt which can take years to pay off. The burden of debt of
magnitude is enough to dissuade many
from going to
, so free
could have enormous benefits to lower-income members of society. If these
complete a
program, they can have increased opportunities for more stable jobs with competitive salaries.
, free
could help impoverished citizens, which would thereby help reduce educational and financial inequalities among citizens of various backgrounds.
free
has other
favorableChange the spelling
show examples
aspects, there are
some key drawbacks to consider. One important drawback is that free
could potentially lead to more competition for
because anyone, regardless of their financial situation, can apply.
results in a larger pool of applicants and creates a need for higher admissions standards. In Finland where
fees are free,
do not struggle
costs but
highly competitive
exams. Because
is so selective in Finland,
may fail to be admitted on their first try, and they could be forced to apply two or even three times.
process could take years
,Remove the comma
show examples
and may require
to get additional help from private tutors. Low-income prospective
could easily feel discouraged by
slim chances of
acceptance, and
the
gives rise to the same problem it aimed to solve in the first place. Essentially, overly competitive
could negate the advantages of free
.
In conclusion, making higher
free for everyone can help many lower-income citizens rise in society, but the resulting cost of free
is
reflected in increasingly fierce competition for
admissions, which works to the advantage of
with the means to afford the extra help.