Some countries achieve international sports by building specialised facilities to train top athletes, instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Do you think this is positive or negative development? Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Recently, many countries have assisted worldwide
sports
by constructing unique facilities
for high athletes
to enhance their performance. alternatively of giving sports
space for non-athletes
. That is
a negative development, humans should practice sports
even if they're not professional athletes
. I feel that for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
Initially
, the nation has the right to train in sports
facilities
without any fiddly. Because people if they train well they'll become high athletes
in the future but if don't
find any sports
places where they should train. their ability to participate in national competitions will decrease and they won't
be qualified to participate in international competitions. For example
, the United States provides many facilities
to non-athletes
, but because it doesn't
the number of Olympic medaille would be reduced and the figure of high athletes
would go down.
Despite this
, there are several positive achievements for top athletes
, who will benefit from this
specialized building as much as they can, they will focus more on their training records, also
the number of achievements will increase. Therefore
, the positive effect of well-designed sports
places is applied to the athletes
and the staff behind this
achievement. For instance
, the UK government built specialized facilities
for high athletes
, which led them to win numerous Medaille at every international Olympics.
In conclusion, it is frequently said that building an upscale place is worthwhile for high-performance athletes
, In contrast
, if these kinds of facilities
aren't
accessible for beginner athletes
the number of sportive people will be reduced. In my opinion, highly designed sports
places should be shared with the whole sports
generation.Submitted by alihafiid on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Your essay lacks a clear structure. It is important to have a distinct introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion to guide the reader smoothly through your arguments. Use paragraphing to separate ideas and maintain a logical flow.
coherence cohesion
Introduction and conclusion are present but they are not effectively built. Introduction should clearly state the topic and your stance, while the conclusion should summarize the main points and reiterate your opinion.
coherence cohesion
While you made an attempt to support your main points, the development of these points is limited. You should aim to provide more detailed explanations and examples to make your argument stronger and more persuasive.
task achievement
Your response only partially addresses the task. You should ensure that you discuss both views of the statement and provide a clear opinion as the task asks for a discussion and not only your viewpoint.
task achievement
Your ideas are relevant but not developed thoroughly. Work on expanding your supporting details to fully address the question prompt. This involves elaborating on points with more comprehensive explanations and examples that are directly linked to the topic.
task achievement
You included examples, but they were not entirely specific or relevant. Strive for clarity in your illustrations and make sure they align with the point you are trying to make. Specificity in examples can significantly enhance the strength of your argument.