One of the most controversial issues today is that some
argue that junk
should be taxed by the
as
decision can make
have more healthy
in their daily consumption. In
essay, I am going to examine
topic from both points of view, and agree with the first idea.
On the one hand, there is a clear argument that unhealthy
is usually refined carbohydrates and contains a
of additives
as salt or fatty sweet sauces which make
mouth-watering and well-smelling. One of the main reasons can be that the company which produces
wants the purchasers to order more, as the latter cannot get enough with its taste.
means that customers who have fine portions of
on their daily menu gain a
of fat and if they do not usually lose a
of energy, they can become obese.
, the
Forbes research about the lifestyle of the average office manager who does not have a
of time for fine and healthy lunch preparation, but has a happy meal from McDonald's at its place, suffers from obesity.
, I agree with the viewpoint that the
should put some restrictions and fees for junk
to reduce its purchasing by customers to make them think about their health.
, I hope that the
should make companies
as Burger King or Papa Jones write some notes on the
wrapping that
products can lead to obesity and apathy if some individual eats it every day.
, there should be more advertisements on TV and radio about nutritious
and healthy diet.
, "The Healthy Society" TV show always has a speech about how fresh vegetables and fruits boost our health, what oils should be used as an additive and how attractive and packed with vitamins a well-balanced diet is.
, more
become healthy and cheered up as some of them were suffering from being overweight, but now feeling true relief.
In conclusion, the
should pay more attention to its citizens' eating habits. It seems to me that
should use less unhealthy products, but follow the technique of how they can improve their daily menu to make it healthier.