Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree?

Britain and Australia

implement

Wrong verb form

implemented

show examples

a law that a panel of

judges

in criminal

case

Fix the agreement mistake

cases

show examples

should have no access

about

Change preposition

to

show examples

the suspect’s illegal

records

. Since

this

will give protection to the

person

who was being alleged of the offence. Nowadays, it is believed that

this

practice should be altered and that the board of

judges

should be given all the previous facts before they reach their verdict about the court

case

. I personally believe that it should be abolished to verify if the

person

is a repeat offender ensuring that the jury wouldn’t be biased

of

Change preposition

in

show examples

their decision, and it might help with

investigation

Add an article

the investigation

show examples

as well. Having access to previous

records

based on facts would help the juries to reach their final judgment.

Firstly

, it would help the

judges

to clarify if the

person

involved has a clean record, or

the

Correct word choice

if the

show examples

person

has similar

records

before. It doesn’t necessarily mean that if the

person

has been involved in several crimes, he/she would automatically be charged

of

Change the preposition

with

show examples

being guilty as the

judges

practice strict morals up to the highest standard.

For instance

, in the

case

of thief and robbery if the

person

involved has the same

case

before presented that the evidence in court was proven to be true

this

would help the jury to decide what is the best action to take for the

person

to start over and not to repeat his/her crime again in the future.

Moreover

,

this

would be a great help with the investigation.

Through the

Change preposition

The

show examples

previous actions committed by the

person

involved if he/she had any of

it

Correct pronoun usage

them

show examples

would help the investigator to find out why

such

misdemeanors

Change the spelling

misdemeanours

show examples

happened.

For example

, if the

person

involved showed that he has a similar record before they would

further

investigate to make sure

their

Replace the word

there

show examples

will

Wrong verb form

would

show examples

be no

loop hole

Correct your spelling

loophole

show examples

in the thorough examination.

To conclude

,

while

others

doubts

Change the verb form

doubt

show examples

that transparency of

records

would make the jury

be

Unnecessary verb

apply

show examples

biased, I firmly believe that they practice a high morale standard.

Moreover

, the access

of

Change preposition

to

show examples

previous

Change the word

previously

show examples

proven unlawful

records

would lead to a much

effective

Correct quantifier usage

more effective

show examples

verdict in the court and might help investigators find the root cause of the committed crime as well.