in a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between two cities. other believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Governments in different countries are spending large
amount
of Fix the agreement mistake
amounts
money
on developing new rail lines for speed trains between two
cities
. But, some of society think spending money
on developing existing public transportation should be a good thing to do. I consider that governments should view both sides.
On the one
hand, spending a large amount of money
on developing railway lines for speed trains between the two
cities
is a good thing. Because, when they develop that it will make a good connection between different cities
in the country and also
public society will use
to use
communicate with every cities
people
. For an
another example, After constructing Remove the article
apply
this
, it will be easy for every people
who are staying in the cities
. Because they can travel to another city quickly by speed train. From that, it will help to protect our air pollution because people
do not need to use
their vehicles to drive. They can use
speed trains for their day-to-day life things.
On the other hand
, while
it is a good thing, But
spending Correct word choice
apply
money
on improving existing public transportation is also
a really important thing. Because air pollution is a very bad situation in the world. So for this
problem, improving this
is a really good thing. For an
example, if there are forty vehicles on Correct article usage
apply
a
Remove the article
apply
one
road, it will be a very high traffic situation due to
lots of vehicles. But if there is only a
Remove the article
apply
one
bus, it not will be happened. Because all people
can use
that bus for their travel. From that, it will bring two
advantages such
as we can reduce vehicle traffic on the roads and can reduce air pollution.
To sum up
, my opinion is governments should not only use
their budgets on constructing new rail lines but also
spend them on promoting current public transportation. Developing both is like killing two
birds with a
Remove the article
apply
one
stone.Submitted by shevonsavidhu14 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Your essay lacks a clear progression of ideas. The logical sequence must be evident, with each paragraph flowing smoothly into the next. Ensure that your points are organized in a manner that makes it easy to follow.
coherence cohesion
You did present an introduction and a conclusion, but they could have been more engaging and clearer in summarizing your main points and opinion. A strong introduction should clearly state the purpose of the essay, while the conclusion should effectively recapitulate your arguments.
coherence cohesion
Even though you included examples to support your main points, the connection between them and your overarching argument wasn't always apparent. Make sure your examples directly back up your statements, strengthening your arguments.
task achievement
You managed to discuss both views on the topic, but your response wasn't completely developed. Expand your ideas further and ensure that you address all parts of the task with more depth and detail.
task achievement
Some of your ideas were clear, yet a number of them needed more comprehensive exposition and more persuasive argumentation. Improve by elaborating on your points and demonstrating a stronger understanding of the topic.
task achievement
Relevant examples were presented, but more specificity could enhance the effectiveness of your argument. Providing particular instances or factual data could greatly support your position and make a more compelling case.